w/l ratio

[disfigured]

Re: w/l ratio

I play entirely for a win, nothing else motivates me, and my W/L ration is just below 1. (.89).

Another stat that really doesn't mean much and can be affected by many factors.

I play to win, but losing is part of winning. I go down swinging on some of the worst teams you've ever seen. Only if it's slaughter and I'm in a crappy mood do I disconnect. Honorable play is one thing, letting a game get to you is another.

I play mostly on clan servers, and often times against stacked teams. Infuriating, but "when in Rome". I have made several routs become drawn out affairs by not giving up on taking spawns, or refusing to give up the last one.

Sometimes it's hopeless and you know it with still 100 tickets left , but you fight on. You'd be surprised some of the great moves and resourceful things you can come up with under duress. I'd say half the whacked out , amazing scramble moves I've made that look like cheating , happen when your back is against the wall. Out of necessity you end up fighting harder and more on the edge.

[TotalBF2er]

Re: w/l ratio

Like I said, it's more of a challenge. The point is the same - who cares about rank, stats or wins/losses when it's not indicative of a player's skill? Many of us play on the losing team.

Oh for the record, I have more wins then losses, but whoopedy doo.

[DesertFalcon]

Re: w/l ratio

mine is .95 mostly because i play as the Usmc on wake island alot

[ACE_FIN1972]

Re: w/l ratio

Like I said, it's more of a challenge. The point is the same - who cares about rank, stats or wins/losses when it's not indicative of a player's skill? Many of us play on the losing team.

Oh for the record, I have more wins then losses, but whoopedy doo.

I hear you man, I also like to join on the weaker (players or side )team. As I said one player doesn't usually make a huge diffence (exept maybe those who are superior with aircrafts) but it's always nice to try to make the difference. Being a member of clearly poor team makes you give, just like disfigured said, that extra in order to fight back. Also it's always so nice to win some bunch of arrogant baserapers .

Dragon Valley is in my opinion best map to succeed in this. There are always those "aces" in their J-10s bombing the carrier 100-0. By some teamwork Chineese airfield is a piece a cake and the these W/L 10-1 fellows are leaving the server :laugh:

[Jay-C_2142]

Re: w/l ratio

i think mines like 1.24..pretty crappy but i mainly play on clan servers which are usually horribly stacked. I'm not gonna make excuses but TBH i wouldn't care if the stat was 0.1 aslong as i'm enjoying myself

[VC_Resurrected]

Re: w/l ratio

Win/loose ratio has to be worst indicator of someones skill, I dont even bother with mine. I prefer a hard fight and a loss than a boring walkover.

[TotalBF2er]

Re: w/l ratio

Win/loose ratio has to be worst indicator of someones skill, I dont even bother with mine. I prefer a hard fight and a loss than a boring walkover.

Well said. Although it can be pretty frustrating at times being on a team that just can't work together, or don't care to, or are getting completely raped, being on the winning team in that situation can be pretty boring.

[mwillin0000]

Re: w/l ratio

just to clarify, since some of you seem to be spazzing a bit, i never said that your W?L ratio had anything to do with skill...i was just interested to see others.

and to whoever mentioned the WTJ or whatever it was. i had a friend who would ONLY play as USMC on kark (atleast i would play on MEC) so he could win everytime. (not so much the case anymore) but then if they were losing he would switch with 2 tickets left. i just dont understand the reasoning behind that. its not like someone is coming along saying "zomg your w/l is .6 you suck lol stay away"


i love imitating the stereotypical *** in the game that nobody likes.