2 or 2142?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aLi3nZ
    Member
    • Aug 2006
    • 396

    #16
    Re: 2 or 2142?

    I absolutely loath 2142 and I am glad that It hasn't stolen too many players form BF2. w00t!

    Lets hope Quake Wars does a better job at a futuristic war game.

    taken from Xfire 1:47PM 1/17/07

    TODAY'S TOP GAMES GAME MINUTES PLAYED
    World of Warcraft 8,983,140
    Call of Duty 2 Multiplayer 3,346,822
    Counter-Strike Source 3,338,299
    Battlefield 2 1,031,451
    Guild Wars 916,000
    Counter-Strike 1.6 908,892
    Silkroad Online 828,831
    Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory 797,163
    Warcraft III - The Frozen Throne 553,898
    Battlefield 2142 537,085
    What does F.E.A.R. look like? just curious I don't have XFire atm..

    Comment

    • wutdafeezi

      #17
      Re: 2 or 2142?

      i prefer real life like guns than the halo sci fi type of guns

      Comment

      • Kapukluk

        #18
        Re: 2 or 2142?

        [QUOTE=
        taken from Xfire 1:47PM 1/17/07

        TODAY'S TOP GAMES GAME MINUTES PLAYED
        World of Warcraft 8,983,140
        Call of Duty 2 Multiplayer 3,346,822
        Counter-Strike Source 3,338,299
        Battlefield 2 1,031,451
        Guild Wars 916,000
        Counter-Strike 1.6 908,892
        Silkroad Online 828,831
        Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory 797,163
        Warcraft III - The Frozen Throne 553,898
        Battlefield 2142 537,085[/QUOTE]

        Hmm, that's interesting. I think that 2142 will advance fast on that list and go up to BF2's minute count within 9 months or so.

        Comment

        • Chris_Redfield
          Member
          • Oct 2006
          • 5986

          #19
          Re: 2 or 2142?

          Originally posted by Kapukluk
          Hmm, that's interesting. I think that 2142 will advance fast on that list and go up to BF2's minute count within 9 months or so.
          Are you joking?

          BF2142 already WAS in front of BF2, but fell off the lead and is continuing the fall.

          Comment

          • d3sc3n7j

            #20
            Re: 2 or 2142?

            Originally posted by EC-Paulus-
            Niether! Go get Call of Duty 2. Awesome game, and its cheap!

            ....but I would suggest Battlefield 2 if that isnt one of your options.:p
            YES!!! THEN! GO get CoD 3!

            To reply to post: Ok, so we went from BF2 to BF2142 What happend to the other 2140 BF games that would come inbetween them?




            (Sorry, I'm retarted sometimes)

            Comment

            • CATIA

              #21
              Re: 2 or 2142?

              Originally posted by Chris_Redfield
              Are you joking?

              BF2142 already WAS in front of BF2, but fell off the lead and is continuing the fall.
              I thought 2142 NEVER, EVER beat BF2 in minutes played, server count or player count.
              Give it 9months? LOL, you have QW, Armed Assult and Front lines coming during that time. If 2142 didn't beat BF2 during the holidays, then it never will.

              Comment

              • imported_Rhino
                Member
                • Dec 2006
                • 1341

                #22
                Re: 2 or 2142?

                Originally posted by AmericanDad
                2142 is for little girls and bf2 is the real thing for men
                Project Reality is for men

                Comment

                • 18Zulukiller
                  Member
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 1107

                  #23
                  Re: 2 or 2142?

                  Any mod that gives a front line soldier nothing but a pistol (AT KIT) isn't worth downloading IMO it was a very poor design decision. And the saddest thing is i was looking forward to project reality being released since i first saw it advertised on the front page of this website BEFORE bf2 was released.

                  Comment

                  • imported_Rhino
                    Member
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 1341

                    #24
                    Re: 2 or 2142?

                    Originally posted by 18zulukiller
                    Any mod that gives a front line soldier nothing but a pistol (AT KIT) isn't worth downloading IMO it was a very poor design decision. And the saddest thing is i was looking forward to project reality being released since i first saw it advertised on the front page of this website BEFORE bf2 was released.
                    In the USMC (not the army) guys who carry the predator AT weapon only get a pistol. They get a guy beside them for defence but the pistol is only a defence weapon. If you have downloaded the latest version of PR (0.4) you will notice we have light AT kits and these guys carry around a assault rifle, and a disposal rocket launcher (apart from the RPG-7, thats more of a place holder for the mo).
                    Also the Heavy AT kit with the predator is a limited request kit now as the power of them has been boosted up to a much more realistic damage rate so they will kill tanks in one or 2 shots.

                    Also the pistol can still kill ppl, 1 shot to the head with any weapon and they are dead. It is a defence weapon, the Heavy AT player is ment to rely on his squad mates to protect him and not engage in battle unless a tank comes rolling along.

                    Project Reality is made for realistic, team play, or as near to it as we can get with the engine we have. Unlike BF2 that is just designed to be a arcade style gameplay can hardly be called a mans game to be honest.

                    Comment

                    • camper.
                      Member
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 3459

                      #25
                      Re: 2 or 2142?

                      Project Reality may be a "man's game" (that spot is reserved by Duke Nukem, however :p), but every gamer is a kid at heart, and some are just... kids.

                      Comment

                      • imported_Rhino
                        Member
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 1341

                        #26
                        Re: 2 or 2142?

                        Originally posted by camperstruck
                        Project Reality may be a "man's game" (that spot is reserved by Duke Nukem, however :p), but every gamer is a kid at heart, and some are just... kids.
                        yes. PR aint for everyone.

                        Comment

                        • Death Merchant
                          Member
                          • Feb 2006
                          • 1090

                          #27
                          Re: 2 or 2142?

                          Originally posted by Chris_Redfield
                          or the fact that CSS handed its 1st FPS title to COD2.
                          CSS seems to have more players on Xfire usually

                          Today 18th January 5:35pm

                          Counter-Strike Source

                          2,397,938 munites

                          Call of Duty 2 Multiplayer

                          2,242,22 munites

                          Comment

                          • Solodon

                            #28
                            Re: 2 or 2142?

                            I can see BF2 having a much longer play life then 2142. 2142 is already futuristic, very little you can do to be more futuristic then futuristic now.
                            Can see people modelling other futuristic objects that do much different then what is already out there. BF2 you can model other existing tangible assets for the next few years,etc....

                            To be blunt 2142 seems to be a supermod of BF2 for the sole purpose of generating additional revenue. Didnt make sense to build a game with the complex award system, rabid mod building community, 2-3 expansions, just to see people jump ship for something slightly different when 2142 came out. Vast majority of BF2 players probly dont even have 2/3 of their medals yet.

                            Comment

                            • VC_Resurrected

                              #29
                              Re: 2 or 2142?

                              Originally posted by 18zulukiller
                              Any mod that gives a front line soldier nothing but a pistol (AT KIT) isn't worth downloading IMO it was a very poor design decision. And the saddest thing is i was looking forward to project reality being released since i first saw it advertised on the front page of this website BEFORE bf2 was released.
                              Mate, didnt you read the word REALITY in the title?

                              Comment

                              • Chris_Redfield
                                Member
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 5986

                                #30
                                Re: 2 or 2142?

                                Originally posted by CATIA
                                I thought 2142 NEVER, EVER beat BF2 in minutes played, server count or player count.
                                Give it 9months? LOL, you have QW, Armed Assult and Front lines coming during that time. If 2142 didn't beat BF2 during the holidays, then it never will.
                                It did, for a short while. I remember checking Xfire gameplay minutes, and I usually do that when I log on to Xfire, just out of curiosity. Bf2142 did lead in that leaderboard. Not by much, but still enough to be called a solid lead.

                                Comment

                                Working...