I don't have a lot of money to shell out on computer hardware, especially when a $50 game like BF2 comes with a hidden $500 computer upgrade bill. But I'm starting to get to the limits of my current system and I wonder if some experts here can shed some light.
My current system is an HP Pavillion zv6000 notebook upgraded with 2GB of RAM, and a 7200rpm hard drive. The machine comes with an ATI Mobility Radeon Xpress 200 Series with 128MB of dedicated RAM and an option in the BIOS to dedicate an extra 128MB from system RAM to the video card, which I have enabled (it doesn't seem to make a difference BTW). The CPU is an AMD Athlon64 3200+, but I am running 32-bit Windows XP because of the lack of driver support through HP for XP64.
Before you say it, BF2 is the only game I really play and this isn't a gaming rig, this is the most computer I could buy for what I do day to day. It's more than adequate for everything else.
The computer was purchased new a few months *after* BF2 was released, yet I can't raise my graphics settings past "Low." Even on Low, in intense firefights, 64-man servers, and graphics-intensive parts like getting shot at by the gun of a Tunguska, for example, the framerate drops like a rock and I'm basically a sitting duck for the first noob with a PKM.
I have an older desktop computer that I just use to offload work onto (number crunching etc). It's got an Athlon XP 2000+ (1.67GHz core), 512MB RAM, and an nVidia GeForceFX 5700. I don't think I have the extra cash lying around to upgrade *both* the processor and the RAM, so I'm wondering, which is more important to BF2, and does it even matter with a card as old as the FX5700? I don't want to dump $400+ for a new mobo and an Athlon64 and (presumably) a different kind of memory just to find out the 5700 doesn't do any better than my Radeon. And I certainly don't want to put in all that money if it doesn't help me counter these *******es who can dance around my tank sticking c4 to everything and I barely have enough horsepower to aim the cannon at them and get a shot off.
Please no flames, I'm a longtime lurker, not a big forum user, I'm not such a big gamer that I can justify an Alienware system, I just cringe thinking we went to the moon on 1960s technology and I can barely play BF2 on a machine that's less than a year old. P.S. Both machines are really clean, I'm not one of these soccer-moms riddled with spyware and Comet Cursor and that freakin monkey that dances on your desktop. I know you guys are in the know so I come to you out of respect for your knowledge.
My current system is an HP Pavillion zv6000 notebook upgraded with 2GB of RAM, and a 7200rpm hard drive. The machine comes with an ATI Mobility Radeon Xpress 200 Series with 128MB of dedicated RAM and an option in the BIOS to dedicate an extra 128MB from system RAM to the video card, which I have enabled (it doesn't seem to make a difference BTW). The CPU is an AMD Athlon64 3200+, but I am running 32-bit Windows XP because of the lack of driver support through HP for XP64.
Before you say it, BF2 is the only game I really play and this isn't a gaming rig, this is the most computer I could buy for what I do day to day. It's more than adequate for everything else.
The computer was purchased new a few months *after* BF2 was released, yet I can't raise my graphics settings past "Low." Even on Low, in intense firefights, 64-man servers, and graphics-intensive parts like getting shot at by the gun of a Tunguska, for example, the framerate drops like a rock and I'm basically a sitting duck for the first noob with a PKM.
I have an older desktop computer that I just use to offload work onto (number crunching etc). It's got an Athlon XP 2000+ (1.67GHz core), 512MB RAM, and an nVidia GeForceFX 5700. I don't think I have the extra cash lying around to upgrade *both* the processor and the RAM, so I'm wondering, which is more important to BF2, and does it even matter with a card as old as the FX5700? I don't want to dump $400+ for a new mobo and an Athlon64 and (presumably) a different kind of memory just to find out the 5700 doesn't do any better than my Radeon. And I certainly don't want to put in all that money if it doesn't help me counter these *******es who can dance around my tank sticking c4 to everything and I barely have enough horsepower to aim the cannon at them and get a shot off.
Please no flames, I'm a longtime lurker, not a big forum user, I'm not such a big gamer that I can justify an Alienware system, I just cringe thinking we went to the moon on 1960s technology and I can barely play BF2 on a machine that's less than a year old. P.S. Both machines are really clean, I'm not one of these soccer-moms riddled with spyware and Comet Cursor and that freakin monkey that dances on your desktop. I know you guys are in the know so I come to you out of respect for your knowledge.


Comment