Handicapping the winning team.

[Chris_Redfield]

This is just an idea I thought of.

What if the rounds in BF2 consisted of 2 rounds. Where winning team starts up from where losing team ended the last round.

For example,
Round 1, winning team has all flags except the uncap.
Round 2, servers switches all players around (fully with squads and whatnot) and the game basically starts where the last game was left off. WInning team starts with one flag, the uncap.

Of course, with rounds where the losing team was capped out, the new round starts as "fresh".

I would imagine this would create quite a challenge.

[DarQu3]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

nah i dont like it.

[N2K]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

Its the same of some maps where there is only one uncap, karkand, clean sweap, dailan, and some servers run team switch with two round maps. Its fun when you dont let anyone invade but funny when your whole team has all the flags before they know what hit them.

[Beerman]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

Nah I dont like it

[imported_The 13th Raptor]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

This is just an idea I thought of.

What if the rounds in BF2 consisted of 2 rounds. Where winning team starts up from where losing team ended the last round.

For example,
Round 1, winning team has all flags except the uncap.
Round 2, servers switches all players around (fully with squads and whatnot) and the game basically starts where the last game was left off. WInning team starts with one flag, the uncap.

Of course, with rounds where the losing team was capped out, the new round starts as "fresh".

I would imagine this would create quite a challenge.

Go away noob.

I mean, it would probably be very frustrating, some flags are really hard to escape from once its camped.

[imported_Voltage]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

As a poster said that's often the situation in servers with teamswap and maps like Karkand and Wake.

It doesn't really become a challenge because most team-swap servers suffers from teamstacking where good and cooperating players end up on one team. I've seen it on a Wake, good team starts as PLA and PLA wins as usual. However, after the teamswap US quickly rolls in and caps all flags within minutes.

Team randomizer ftw.

[Chris_Redfield]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

Go away noob.

I mean, it would probably be very frustrating, some flags are really hard to escape from once its camped.

I didnt present this idea from the losing teams point of view. On the contrary, I meant a challenge for the winning team. Youre not up for a challenge? Look whos the n00b now.

Voltage, I guess youre right. It rarely matters in what situation the team is, is the players who dictate...

I dont really like team randomizer because I only play with my buds, and being separated from each other all the time gets annoying. So I was just thinking, if you put a team into a really hard situation, how much would it help, or even prolongue the game.

[SERIALBUTCHER]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

I didnt present this idea from the losing teams point of view. On the contrary, I meant a challenge for the winning team. Youre not up for a challenge? Look whos the n00b now.

Voltage, I guess youre right. It rarely matters in what situation the team is, is the players who dictate...

I dont really like team randomizer because I only play with my buds, and being separated from each other all the time gets annoying. So I was just thinking, if you put a team into a really hard situation, how much would it help, or even prolongue the game.

Last week said you just play where the server puts you, & that using teamwork w/ your buddies in TS was "team stacking", & it makes you a "coward"

Chris_Redfield = Major League Hipocrite (& it didn't take long)

http://www.totalbf2.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1149992#poststop

Now this week you post this communist, socialist BS

rotflmao

Lieutenant General |SI|SERIALBUTCHER

peace:)

[Chris_Redfield]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

Last week said you just play where the server puts you, & that using teamwork in w/ your buddies in TS was "team stacking", & it makes you a "coward"

I play with my buds because of the company, not because I want to win, I play with my buddies when Im on land, only. And having a 0,96:1 assault KDR doesnt really add to "teamstacking". So lets digest YOUR quote.

I am a winner

& if you care more about your own k/d, than the win, you don't roll w/ my squad

You openly confess that you join the "winning" team, or, the team where "your high ranking buddies" are, to win the game.

Chris_Redfield = Major League Hipocrite (& it didn't take long)

Although it may seem contradicting, the message is still different. But maybe its just because youre so desperate to prove a point, whatever that one may be. And, it too didnt take too long...

Now this week you post this communist, socialist BS

So whats so comminist and socialist about turning the tables in a game.



-


The idea itsself comes from ET, actually. The second round of a game is dictated by the results set in the first round. So in BF2, second round of a game could be a continuation of the first, and the winning team is handicapped. Communist? No. Challenge? Yes. Idea that DICE will never implement? Absolutely.

[CDN-SMOKEJUMPER]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

Dude, you lost this round and you do appear to be a hipocrite.

[EyeofG]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

That's really unfair.
This would mean that the server would be one-side
It would suck

[SERIALBUTCHER]

Re: Handicapping the winning team.

I play with my buds because of the company, not because I want to win, I play with my buddies when Im on land, only. And having a 0,96:1 assault KDR doesnt really add to "teamstacking". So lets digest YOUR quote.



You openly confess that you join the "winning" team, or, the team where "your high ranking buddies" are, to win the game.



Although it may seem contradicting, the message is still different. But maybe its just because youre so desperate to prove a point, whatever that one may be. And, it too didnt take too long...



So whats so comminist and socialist about turning the tables in a game.



-


The idea itsself comes from ET, actually. The second round of a game is dictated by the results set in the first round. So in BF2, second round of a game could be a continuation of the first, and the winning team is handicapped. Communist? No. Challenge? Yes. Idea that DICE will never implement? Absolutely.

You MUST be smoking crack, when did I "openly confess" to joining the winning team?

My team IS the winning team that everybody is trying to join n00b

You guys complain because ppl won't make, or join squads, when I create a squad it fills up instantly

You SPECIFICALLY stated, I play w/ strangers, now you ONLY play w/ your buds, YOU ARE BUSTED :p

Chris "Lord Grand Wizard KING of all Hipocrites" last week

"Thats roughly 2:1. Remember the thread about a guy who got a 7:1 WLR? I personally made a race with a new account for the WLR stats. I managed to get 17 wins before I took one loss. No teamstacking, no teamswitches, playing with total strangers. Then again, I was in a jet too, which for some makes the work less worth. I often switch teams to tip the balance. Youre saying you do this for the "teamwork". Right, stack all skilled players on the server to one side and call it "teamwork". "

Chris "Lord Grand Wizard King of all hipocrites" this week

"I dont really like team randomizer because I only play with my buds, and being separated from each other all the time gets annoying. So I was just thinking, if you put a team into a really hard situation, how much would it help, or even prolongue the game."
__________________

You need to get off that 5h1t:)

Wait, this all makes sense now, you are a girl aren't you? woman's proagative right?

"game blouses b1tches"

Lieutenant General |SI|SERIALBUTCHER

peace:)