C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

[DarQu3]

what do you think is a better method of destroying armor, apc's, cars and the rest, C4 OR BAZOOKA A.K.A ANTI TANK????

the anti tank is good but i much rather prefer the C4 when it comes to tanks and apcs cause its alot more stealhier and only takes 2 c4 packs to destroy a ful health tank. The downside to it is you have to pretty much go kamakazi when it knows your around. Pro to anti tank is long range but con is takes what 3 shots to kill a full health tank, and by that time its spotted you and your pretty much screwed.

what does everyone else prefer???

[barz26]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

AT.......I used to hate AT'ers. Thought they were a load of cowboys that couldnt fight with guns and had to go round shooting infantry with the AT missile. However, was getting my AT over 1.0 and found a whole new respect for them, it's a lot harder than it looks and you can spend ages trying to kill a tank, risk dying and then someone takes one shot...and the glory from you!!!
I used to go exclusively Spec ops and enjoy sneaking up on a couple of APC's and blowing them both up before they know what hit them, or laying traps but the excitement and bravado has to lay with the AT

[Jungles]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

I started playing AT again recently to get the Basic AT badge. Since getting the badge, I've kept playing because it is such a versatile class, and is also a very important class on some maps. Many times I've felt helpless against tanks and APCs, now with AT at least I can be a solution to the problem.

The only downside is the lack of grenades. But the DAO-12 and P90 are both very good for CQB, and rockets can take out enemies at long-range in most cases anyway.

The one thing that annoys me is when after dicing with a tank and getting a good couple of shots off, another player rocks up and takes the kill. Feels like wasted effort sometimes.

Back to the original topic: if the tank is within spitting distance, Spec-Ops is better with C4; but if the tank is more than sprinting distance away, AT is better.

[18Zulukiller]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

Well IMO putting c4 on armour is only good when armour is in an enclosed space so that basically restricts its use to the city maps AND THERE ARNT MANY OF THEM. If you truely want to kill armour take the AT kit and aim for the tracks/wheel arches and the thing will be dead in two shots. Theres not only that you dont have to even be able to see the Armour to kill it many a time ive been hidden around a corner shot an AT missle and guide it onto the tank without even being able to see it.

[Frozo]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

if u've got plenty of cover near the tank and can get in close w/o being shot by supporting infantry (if the tank is smart) if he jst rushes into the thick of it he can easily be taken out with c4. if he sticks back however u need AT to hit him at long range. u nd a mate as AT can take down tanks pretty easy

[Komet.nl]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

I prefer the Sraw/Eryx since I mostly make it unguided by switching to my pistol or my primary weapon after firing it..

[DarQu3]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

after about 6 rounds i just played i think it AT is pretty awesome. your right C4 is better for enclosed maps. kinda need AT for maps like Fushe pass and wake island.

[ConscriptVirus]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

C4 is just suicidal...if u r spotted, the tank just moves back and ur dead..but AT if u know how to use it, its a pretty good weapon

c4 is for jihading and like booby traps.

[imported_BlueBlaz0r]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

i prefer C4. all ya need is two packs and boom, quick and sweet. Rockets are ok, but it can be frustrating when you run around dodging tank shells and finally put your third rocket into a tank and then right before it is about to blow, some guy comes along and fires a rocket and he gets the kill. Plus, sometimes all ya gotta do is run at a tank with your C4 and the driver will just jump out and give ya a free tank.

[DesertFalcon]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

if i can get a vehicle or if im behind it ill use c4 but i can take outa tan with 2 at shots.

[Auto-ER-]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

I love when you get close to a tank, throw some C4 on as he sees you, go prone, and then they back up real fast away from you, just to see your detonator in hand...BOOM!!!

[Sir. Blackhawk 5]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

I prefer C4, but its the hard part to run up to him and pray he does not see you. then 2-3 ought to do the trick, I prefer C4, espeically on armor convoys, if you get hit by an AT, the other guys automatically repair him. but 2-3 C4 without them looking can kill one tank.

[GMEM]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

I prefer the bazooka... more chance to survive it yourself...
I wish the Bazooka's were stronger....

[Bubas]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

Did you notice that AT is the best gun at mid range?
When you see someone shoot at his feet, normally he goes prone and Bang count one kill for you, and he doesn´t have time to shoot back at you.

Against tanks...don´t shoot if you don´t have some cover to duck.

When I am in a tank I don´t mind a lot spec ops...normaly i I see them I can outrun them and when they just go after me they tend to die.

So as you see I prefer AT against tanks.

[sassback]

Re: C4 VS bazooka for destroyin tank

im a bit of a coward. ill place a load of C4 above a flag or in the middle of the road and detonate when the tank or apc is next to/over it.