1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

[Sung_Do_Chuck]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Wow! I'm impressed. This tool is absolutely usefull
Keeewwl!!

thx harmor

[JonnyMacFred102]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Wow that's awesome!

How come all the weapons though either have a rate of fire of 600 or 900 (except for the pkm with 450)???


And also, i suggest you change the "This wouldn't had been possible without it" at the top of the page to "This wouldn't have been possible without it."

[infinite_loop]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Very nice tool, thanks for putting that together. Being able to do side-to-side comparisons, it made it clear to me that the G36E likely the best gun in the game. Now I know why everyone is a medic

[Harmor]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Updated the style sheet to make it look like BF2.

[jdrou]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Yeah, harmor, gj! But I was wondering what the little * over the M95 damage means? Headshot?

Probably to note that the M95 is different from all other handheld bullet weapons in that it does not have damage reduced by body armor.

How come all the weapons though either have a rate of fire of 600 or 900 (except for the pkm with 450)???

Because all the automatic weapons do have RoF 600 or 900 in the game except the PKM (and the Jackhammer).

You might want to change "minimum deviation" to "base deviation" for clarity. DICE calls the value "minDev" but it actually functions as the base for further modifications, not the minimum. Similarly, you might want to use "base damage" instead of "damage" since the actual damage varies depending on the target type.

"Sub deviation added per shot" should probably be something like "per-shot deviation reduction per second". (Analogous to the way the cool-down value relates to the heat-added value.)

"Deviation while . . ." should all be "Deviation modifier while . . .".

[Harmor]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

You might want to change "minimum deviation" to "base deviation" for clarity. DICE calls the value "minDev" but it actually functions as the base for further modifications, not the minimum. Similarly, you might want to use "base damage" instead of "damage" since the actual damage varies depending on the target type.

"Sub deviation added per shot" should probably be something like "per-shot deviation reduction per second". (Analogous to the way the cool-down value relates to the heat-added value.)

"Deviation while . . ." should all be "Deviation modifier while . . .".

Done. Thanks for the input.

[Sung_Do_Chuck]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Updated the style sheet to make it look like BF2.

Hehe i saw it. n1ce job!

[DOGGiE52]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

There isn't any style sheet at the moment. Everything is inline atm. You got any suggestions? I'm a programmer, not an artist.


<--- A guy who would just as well have a Bean Bag for a furniture in his Living Room instead of a couch.

If you wwant, I could give some handful tips on CSS, I run two websites which rely quite much on CSS, therfor I'm quite experienced. PM me if you want.

[BlacKSmurF]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Hey this is great, my only suggestions are making the drop-down list appear in the order you select the class in-game or in alphabetical order (in addition to fixing the zoomming typo)

Very nice work... it's a useful tool for me. I now know that the SCAR-H is very, very similar to the AK-101 and now I won't feel jipped playing as the MEC against the SEALs, lol...

This next suggestion may or may not be a lot of work, but some of these guns aren't that identifiable to the user by name - "Type 88" or anyone that just plays video games for fun and knows next to nothing about gun names may become confused staring at a bunch of letters and numbers. While I'm not one of those people I think that having a picture of the guns might be kind of nice out to the left - the first gun you chose at the top, the second one right below it. Or just put the name of the gun on the picture! :)

[JonnyMacFred102]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Here's a spelling mistake. In the 'Recoil while Zoommed' category, zoomed is spelled with only one m (you have two m's).

[Harmor]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

Here's a spelling mistake. In the 'Recoil while Zoommed' category, zoomed is spelled with only one m (you have two m's).

Fixed.

Reordered the drop down lists in the order you select your kit in-game (Special Forces, Sniper, Assault, Support, Engineer, Medic, Anti-tank).

[zipp0r]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

when comparing ak101 to ak47 there is info missing, like rate of fire, when i compare ak101 to a ma16 or something

[jdrou]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

when comparing ak101 to ak47 there is info missing, like rate of fire, when i compare ak101 to a ma16 or something

It omits identical stats unless you check the "Show All" box.

[Harmor]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

I could add images to the left/right of the table pretty easily. Do you guys really want images of the guns like this:



or smaller images like:



or like this:



I could even do it where you mouse over the images and you get the larger popup.


I kinda like the simplicity of the website. If someone is really interested in comparing stats of a gun, I would think they already know the name and what it looks like?

Fixed a minor error with the Anti-tank guns...they had their deviation set to "2" instead of "2.0" which caused them to compare differently when compared to other guns with "2.0"

EDIT10: Updated page to include the image of the weapon like this:

[Sung_Do_Chuck]

Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage

W000t!! The images are looking totaly awesome dude!! Gr8 Work!

Now it's perfect