THAT ALL THE BEST PLAYERS ON THE GAME USE THE "NORMAL" GUNS AND NOT THE UNLOCKS, I PERSONALLY THINK THE SA80 AND THE G3 ARE FAR BETTER THAN THE G36 FAMILY AND THE SCAR - GARBAGE, YOUD THINK WHEN YOU GOT TO UNLOCK A GUN LIKE THE G36E OR MG36 THEY WOULD BE BETTER THAN THERE PREDASECCERS, WOT DO U GUYS THINK.
It all depends on what you like and whats going on. I OWN with the PKM. But right now I have the urge to use the regular US suppot gun. And the AK-101(MEC Medic) is sooooo goooddd.
My question to you is who are these ...... "BEST PLAYERS ON THE GAME"...? I hope your not refering to the guys who play one map.
I wont say any names... but i saw a top 10 guy who had over 7592 rounds on Karkand and his next highest played map was Sharqi with a stagering 119 rounds. I think these guys are great at the one map they "specialize on" but i wouldn't consider them the best players. So be specific on who your talking about if you want discussion.
Base weapons FTW! I dont think the unlocks should not have been weapons but rather the skills each class gets. All the base weapons, with the exception of the type 85, are fine. I can be top in a server,with base weapons, time and time again. Some unlocks do have there little advantages, but they really amount to nothing. In the long run it becomes skill with what you are given much like every other piece of equipment in this game.
I would argue the Sniper's unlocks completely aid that kit and its ability to vary what his actions are. Because their is no comparing an SVD with the L96A1
Lately i've just been using the M16A2/M203 and the AK101/GP30 just because if the bigger clips and they have a far better consistency in terms of hitting the target compared to the G3A3. Dont get me wrong, I love the G3A3 but I just need a little alone time from it with a reliable American gun.
IMO, the unlocks are not ment to be better than the original, but an alternative that you can use with any army, which gives you the advantage of consistence. Instead, of having to switch weapons whenever you switch armies. If they had made the unlocks far better than the originals, it would be unfair to players who just started playing.
i used to use exclusively unlocks but then i realized that a skilled combatant could fare equally well with the defaults. i have come to love the defaults once again with the exception of the at and assauly kits. it really comes to prefference tho.
IMO, the unlocks are not ment to be better than the original, but an alternative that you can use with any army, which gives you the advantage of consistence. Instead, of having to switch weapons whenever you switch armies. If they had made the unlocks far better than the originals, it would be unfair to players who just started playing.
Ya, you hit it there. The idea was to bring variety, not superiority
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Is It True
Comment