Is it just me or does anyone else think that the scoring system needs revising? BF2's not deathmatch, it's Conquest so why do you get the same number of points for a kill as for a flag capture? I know that if you own a lot of flags the tickets tick down for the opposing team but not fast enough to counterbalance the sheer number of kills that are going on.
So many times when I'm playing, I've had a good round with lots of caps but I'm way down the scoreboard and people with tons of kills (jet whores, etc) and pretty well nothing else end up "winning". I'm not a points whore but it would be nice be rewarded with all my caps by placing high on the scoreboard. It really feels like there's not much point capping as there are far greater rewards both in personal points and contributing to your team by killing instead of capping.
The way things are the points whores are rewarded by "winning", we may as well be playing deathmatch. If the points were changed for a flag cap to 5, surely that would encourage people to cap more than kill? I know there's no way in hell it'll ever happen, it's just a thought though.
So many times when I'm playing, I've had a good round with lots of caps but I'm way down the scoreboard and people with tons of kills (jet whores, etc) and pretty well nothing else end up "winning". I'm not a points whore but it would be nice be rewarded with all my caps by placing high on the scoreboard. It really feels like there's not much point capping as there are far greater rewards both in personal points and contributing to your team by killing instead of capping.
The way things are the points whores are rewarded by "winning", we may as well be playing deathmatch. If the points were changed for a flag cap to 5, surely that would encourage people to cap more than kill? I know there's no way in hell it'll ever happen, it's just a thought though.
Comment