We were hacked. Several times over the past two weeks, in fact.
While all passwords are encrypted and salted, it's recommended that you change your password here when you can.
a plane ALWAYS has jetstream coming from the wings. why doesn't the top plane have any jetstream while the bottom one does?
Exactly and peopl have no idea of Photoshop these days cause you will edit a picture you don't "Photoshop" it that's the name of the program.. And if it was flipped vertically you would still had to cut it out with pen tool or maskings and colour it why would you even bother do that?
Of course it could then it was edited..
But it isn't if I look at it.
If you would flip it look at the lighting of the planes the plane downwards has lighting on it's wingtip the above not..
a plane ALWAYS has jetstream coming from the wings. why doesn't the top plane have any jetstream while the bottom one does?
No the jets dont ALWAYS have jet stream coming from the wing tips.. often its only when turning,banking or pitching up or down at a certain speed. Otherwise flying flat and level there is no jet stream coming from the wing tips.
Exactly and peopl have no idea of Photoshop these days cause you will edit a picture you don't "Photoshop" it that's the name of the program.. And if it was flipped vertically you would still had to cut it out with pen tool or maskings and colour it why would you even bother do that?
Of course it could then it was edited..
But it isn't if I look at it.
If you would flip it look at the lighting of the planes the plane downwards has lighting on it's wingtip the above not..
Case closed?
~ Komet
I'm not sure what you're saying here, but it's not edited. The bottom plane has jets streams coming off of the wings because it's obviously just flipped over to get underneath the plane above him.
It would be almost impossible to edit all of those shots to show the same exact position and angle of the jets in relation to each other.
Looks legit to me, two images of the same scene from 2 angles perfectly photshopped to look legit? Even if he did photshop it, it would be an amazing photshop job.
Upon a cursory glance the image does appear to be photoshopped; after all, how can it be that perfect? But yeah, as people said, the jetstreams and everything else match up. It's legit.
Looks legit to me, two images of the same scene from 2 angles perfectly photshopped to look legit? Even if he did photshop it, it would be an amazing photshop job.
QFT
to be honest with the evidence available anyone who says this is a shop is a noob.
Even if it is a shop he deserves the credit for not messing up one single thing.
Also if it was a shop do you think the planes would be slightly mis-aligned?
why do u think its called photoshop your just looking at the pics and not thinking about it
p.s i have seen real photoshops that would blow u away or some superrealism art (paint and drawing freehand)that isnt photoshopped and u would say it real:p
I'm not sure what you're saying here, but it's not edited. The bottom plane has jets streams coming off of the wings because it's obviously just flipped over to get underneath the plane above him.
It would be almost impossible to edit all of those shots to show the same exact position and angle of the jets in relation to each other.
uh.. That's what I ment. It's almost impossible to edit all those things like colouring it etc. It isn't imspossible but it isn't worth trying..
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment