I know the netcode is bad, but this is getting ridiculus

[Orion126]

Re: I know the netcode is bad, but this is getting ridiculus

Thanks for the info and site...learned something new =D

[Drevor]

Re: I know the netcode is bad, but this is getting ridiculus

You dont need a firewall when playing BF2. Especially if your system is not cutting it. You would be using resources that would better be used for the game instead. Hackers want to get into places where they can learn something, they dont want to see your pr0n collection.
If you have problems with BF2 look here:

http://bf2lag.com/index.html

lol notice that the same guy who is suggesting to disable your firewall points you to a infected site.

unpatched MSIE may get infected

[bitvomit]

Re: I know the netcode is bad, but this is getting ridiculus

lol notice that the same guy who is suggesting to disable your firewall points you to a infected site.

unpatched MSIE may get infected

Interesting. I like how he he explained what information hackers "really" want. I think revolution has some explaining to od...

http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/defaced/2000-08/0356.html

Someone named Revoluti0n defacing random websites. Google search of his name brings up many of these. Coincidence? Someone else?

[BlueBunny63]

Re: I know the netcode is bad, but this is getting ridiculus

Same here, has happened many times to me. So i just leave the server and find a better one, thats the only advice i can give. :/

Hey Punisher, is that shield on your sig from the "Charlemagne" Waffen-SS division? You know, the one composed mainly of French volunteers?

[Raiblast]

Re: I know the netcode is bad, but this is getting ridiculus

zone alarm is a major bf2 killer. i used ZA for years, but when i started playing BF2, i quickly found out that i had to turn it off in order to even play. i would constantly get connection problems and disconnects until i turned it off.

[imported_AbblePC]

Re: I know the netcode is bad, but this is getting ridiculus

#1 Bit Vomit please your Sig is annoying at best... What ever happened to forums that allowed one size sig and everyone conformed or you just didnt get one? If your sig was at least a graphic I would maybe tolerate it.. but the Quoted text bos gets me reading your sig alot thinking its the next post..

#2 I use Firefox with NO Scipt.. when you block the other sites he has advertising or running thier little scripts on that page, you dont get the iinfected file.. So are you sure its coming directly from him and not one of the affiliated sites?

[bitvomit]

Re: I know the netcode is bad, but this is getting ridiculus

#1 Bit Vomit please your Sig is annoying at best... What ever happened to forums that allowed one size sig and everyone conformed or you just didnt get one? If your sig was at least a graphic I would maybe tolerate it.. but the Quoted text bos gets me reading your sig alot thinking its the next post..

#2 I use Firefox with NO Scipt.. when you block the other sites he has advertising or running thier little scripts on that page, you dont get the iinfected file.. So are you sure its coming directly from him and not one of the affiliated sites?

Totally OT but here goes:

#1 I have yet to see any moderators remove or complain about it so apparantly it is allowed. I happen to find all the graphical sigs and avatars on here to be highly annoying but that's just my opinion.

#2 From what drevor posted it appears that the trojan was imbedded in the favicon.ico file (the file that is responsible for that neat little icon in your tab). It may be a bit of a stretch to accuse Revoloti0n of planting it but I've seen stranger things happen...