Google OS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Iwantcable
    Member
    • Jul 2007
    • 2362

    #1

    Google OS



    It's been an exciting nine months since we launched the Google Chrome browser. Already, over 30 million people use it regularly. We designed Google Chrome for people who live on the web — searching for information, checking email, catching up on the news, shopping or just staying in touch with friends. However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web. So today, we're announcing a new project that's a natural extension of Google Chrome — the Google Chrome Operating System. It's our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be.

    Google Chrome OS is an open source, lightweight operating system that will initially be targeted at netbooks. Later this year we will open-source its code, and netbooks running Google Chrome OS will be available for consumers in the second half of 2010. Because we're already talking to partners about the project, and we'll soon be working with the open source community, we wanted to share our vision now so everyone understands what we are trying to achieve.

    Speed, simplicity and security are the key aspects of Google Chrome OS. We're designing the OS to be fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds. The user interface is minimal to stay out of your way, and most of the user experience takes place on the web. And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don't have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work.

    Google Chrome OS will run on both x86 as well as ARM chips and we are working with multiple OEMs to bring a number of netbooks to market next year. The software architecture is simple — Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel. For application developers, the web is the platform. All web-based applications will automatically work and new applications can be written using your favorite web technologies. And of course, these apps will run not only on Google Chrome OS, but on any standards-based browser on Windows, Mac and Linux thereby giving developers the largest user base of any platform.

    Google Chrome OS is a new project, separate from Android. Android was designed from the beginning to work across a variety of devices from phones to set-top boxes to netbooks. Google Chrome OS is being created for people who spend most of their time on the web, and is being designed to power computers ranging from small netbooks to full-size desktop systems. While there are areas where Google Chrome OS and Android overlap, we believe choice will drive innovation for the benefit of everyone, including Google.

    We hear a lot from our users and their message is clear — computers need to get better. People want to get to their email instantly, without wasting time waiting for their computers to boot and browsers to start up. They want their computers to always run as fast as when they first bought them. They want their data to be accessible to them wherever they are and not have to worry about losing their computer or forgetting to back up files. Even more importantly, they don't want to spend hours configuring their computers to work with every new piece of hardware, or have to worry about constant software updates. And any time our users have a better computing experience, Google benefits as well by having happier users who are more likely to spend time on the Internet.

    We have a lot of work to do, and we're definitely going to need a lot of help from the open source community to accomplish this vision. We're excited for what's to come and we hope you are too. Stay tuned for more updates in the fall and have a great summer.
  • =98=
    Member
    • Oct 2006
    • 10299

    #2
    Re: Google OS

    I can has instead of Symbian?

    Comment

    • AlecJ32
      Site Staff
      • Aug 2008
      • 502

      #3
      Re: Google OS

      ....Something besides Debian that offers a build for the ARM architecture?:shock:

      I'm shocked!

      Comment

      • =98=
        Member
        • Oct 2006
        • 10299

        #4
        Re: Google OS

        I wonder whether Windows will ever support ARM properly?

        Comment

        • AlecJ32
          Site Staff
          • Aug 2008
          • 502

          #5
          Re: Google OS

          Originally posted by Alex98uk
          I wonder whether Windows will ever support ARM properly?
          Considering that Windows doesn't even support PowerPC or DEC Alpha anymore, and hasn't ever supported SPARC to my knowledge, they probably won't ever support ARM unless it becomes quite popular in netbooks.

          Comment

          • Vreki
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2007
            • 4226

            #6
            Re: Google OS

            I remember reading about this

            The software architecture is simple — Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel.
            So its a linux distro with their own browser preinstalled. Not exactly earth-shattering news, various lightweight linux have been available for most netbooks for some time.


            However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web.
            Thats BS, you are not going to find many lines of pre-web code in a modern OS. Remeber how MS have managed to entangle IE so deep in windows that it has become part of the OS? At least that is what they claimed when asked to remove it.


            So today, we're announcing a new project that's a natural extension of Google Chrome — the Google Chrome Operating System. It's our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be.
            By making a new GUI to an OS first designed in 1991 (and based on the even older Unix)? What happend to " designed in an era where there was no web"?

            I dont think Googles marketing department get that whole "Dont be evil" thing

            Comment

            • AlecJ32
              Site Staff
              • Aug 2008
              • 502

              #7
              Re: Google OS

              Originally posted by Vreki
              Thats BS, you are not going to find many lines of pre-web code in a modern OS. Remeber how MS have managed to entangle IE so deep in windows that it has become part of the OS? At least that is what they claimed when asked to remove it.
              Though I agree it's BS, I believe that IE example is a case of which came first. Did they make the Windows shell off of IE's layout engine, or simply add the rendering features to the shell and integrate web browsing into the shell, resulting in Internet Explorer?

              Originally posted by Vreki
              By making a new GUI to an OS first designed in 1991 (and based on the even older Unix)? What happend to " designed in an era where there was no web"?
              Right...the Linux kernel has very strong roots in Unix, which goes all the way back to the late 60's. Not to mention, the internet was commercially and publicly released in 1991, while most of the major components in all modern operating systems have been developed long after 1991. And the network principles and concepts behind the internet have been around long since the internet was released to the public.

              The only way they're changing the 'operating system' as we know it is by cutting it down to only the bare-bones and sticking a web browser on it.

              Comment

              • Vreki
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2007
                • 4226

                #8
                Re: Google OS

                Originally posted by AlecJ32
                The only way they're changing the 'operating system' as we know it is by cutting it down to only the bare-bones and sticking a web browser on it.
                Yeah, and why would we want to be limited in that way?
                I dont expect much performance difference between two linux distros just because one have more applications installed

                It will be interesting to see the reviews once this goes live, because right now I cant really see what the point is.

                Comment

                Working...