GTX 260 core 216/55nm

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Wizrdwarts
    Member
    • Dec 2006
    • 3754

    #1

    GTX 260 core 216/55nm

    Why aren't they called GTX 265s or 270s? One point I've heard was so Nvidia could sneak out the remaining core 192/65nm stock out, but EVGA is making it obvious that they're 55nm and Newegg has seperate catagories for core 192/216.

    Yeah, so if Nvidia just thought about it more before making rebrands/sharing names, it'd be a lot less confusing.
  • [21CW]HIVictim
    Member
    • Mar 2007
    • 260

    #2
    Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

    Its not a rebrand at all, its just the GTX 260 Core 216 on a 55nm process.

    There are 3 stock models of the GTX 260:
    GTX 260
    GTX 260 Core 216 (65nm)
    GTX 260 Core 216 (55nm)

    Comment

    • Wizrdwarts
      Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 3754

      #3
      Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

      Originally posted by [3MIB]1FD|WO1.HIVictim View Post
      Its not a rebrand at all, its just the GTX 260 Core 216 on a 55nm process.

      There are 3 stock models of the GTX 260:
      GTX 260
      GTX 260 Core 216 (65nm)
      GTX 260 Core 216 (55nm)
      I was talking about the rest of their products. 8800GS -> 9600GSO 96SP, which also shares its name with the 9600GSO 48SP.

      And now we have 3 cards going under the same name with the GTX 260s. :shakehead:

      Comment

      • Death Merchant
        Member
        • Feb 2006
        • 1090

        #4
        Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

        Originally posted by Wizrdwarts View Post
        Why aren't they called GTX 265s or 270s? One point I've heard was so Nvidia could sneak out the remaining core 192/65nm stock out, but EVGA is making it obvious that they're 55nm and Newegg has seperate catagories for core 192/216.

        Yeah, so if Nvidia just thought about it more before making rebrands/sharing names, it'd be a lot less confusing.
        Its because Nvidia is able to sell off old stock for the same price if the names remain the same

        Comment

        • =98=
          Member
          • Oct 2006
          • 10299

          #5
          Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

          Originally posted by Death Merchant
          Its because Nvidia is able to sell off old stock for the same price if the names remain the same
          Yup, it's all about stock clearance. I suspect Nvidia overestimated sales before the market took a turn for the worse. Now they have to get rid of the things.

          Comment

          • Wizrdwarts
            Member
            • Dec 2006
            • 3754

            #6
            Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

            So why are card makers allowed to advertise 55nm and core 216s?

            Comment

            • =98=
              Member
              • Oct 2006
              • 10299

              #7
              Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

              Because it would be false advertising to claim they are exactly the same.

              Comment

              • [21CW]HIVictim
                Member
                • Mar 2007
                • 260

                #8
                Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

                Originally posted by Wizrdwarts
                So why are card makers allowed to advertise 55nm and core 216s?
                Did you not see my post? They are two different cards, that is why.

                Comment

                • Wizrdwarts
                  Member
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 3754

                  #9
                  Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

                  Originally posted by [3MIB]1FD|WO1.HIVictim View Post
                  Did you not see my post? They are two different cards, that is why.
                  Of course they're two (three) different cards, but Nvidia's original plan was to sneak the 55nm 260s in while getting rid of the 65nm first.

                  Comment

                  • Busby, Paul (Bicci)

                    #10
                    Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

                    The shrunken manufacturing process hasnt really made any difference to power and due to a slightly adjusted heatsink the temps are pretty much the same too. Along with the same clock speeds you get from 65nm i dont really see any need to make a big deal out of it.

                    Comment

                    • =98=
                      Member
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 10299

                      #11
                      Re: GTX 260 core 216/55nm

                      55nm would only really excite those who voltmod their cards.

                      Comment

                      Working...