CPU comparison

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • x + 95 = 4x - 10

    #1

    CPU comparison

    Hi

    how much slower/faster would a pentium 4 2.26ghz HT be against a celeron d 3.0ghz? and the difference between a pentium 4 2.8ghz and a celeron d 3.0 ghz?
  • looqas

    #2
    There's a comparison chart at Tom's Hardware.

    Comment

    • Flt. Sgt. Powderhound
      Member
      • May 2007
      • 962

      #3
      Why are you interested in completely outdated CPUs?

      Comment

      • jake_
        Fitter, Happier.
        • Mar 2007
        • 4959

        #4
        Originally posted by Flt. Sgt. Powderhound
        Why are you interested in completely outdated CPUs?
        Yeah, what he said. :p


        Are you thinking of upgrading to one of those? If so.... what are you thinking/smoking? :|:

        Comment

        • Hellsent 2.0
          Member
          • Jul 2007
          • 2137

          #5
          Maybe he dont have enough dosh to get a better one...

          Comment

          • Vash2051

            #6
            Seriously less questions more helping. It doesn't matter why he wants to know just give him a straight answer! Everyone's happy! Yay! If he wants an opinion on WHAT processor he should get he'll ask.

            Comment

            • signa
              CS-Nation / TGN Staff
              • Dec 2004
              • 4191

              #7
              Originally posted by x + 95 = 4x - 10
              Hi

              how much slower/faster would a pentium 4 2.26ghz HT be against a celeron d 3.0ghz? and the difference between a pentium 4 2.8ghz and a celeron d 3.0 ghz?
              without research I think I would go with the P4, especially if its a 'northwood' (and socket 478). those northwoods are great overclockers, especially the 2.4ghz. Ive never been a fan of celerons because of their crippled L1 and L2 cache size.

              P4 2.26 vs Cd 3.0 --> celeron probably has the edge.
              P4 2.8 vs Cd 3.0 ---> P4 would probably be much better.

              out of all those chips you listed the P4 2.8 would be the best.
              "Crunch's First Officer"
              twitter: @signaprime

              Comment

              • x + 95 = 4x - 10

                #8
                thanks signa and the reason is because i only surf the web and play Americas Army so i dont really need a high tech processor

                Comment

                • =98=
                  Member
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 10299

                  #9
                  You can get a low end core 2 duo for about £40, and it would wipe the floor with a P4 or PentiumD

                  Comment

                  • jake_
                    Fitter, Happier.
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 4959

                    #10
                    Originally posted by x + 95 = 4x - 10
                    thanks signa and the reason is because i only surf the web and play Americas Army so i dont really need a high tech processor
                    core 2 duo isn't exactly "high tech" anymore.
                    Its pretty standard. P4 is outdated. :p

                    Comment

                    • x + 95 = 4x - 10

                      #11
                      i can see your point but for my needs a pentium4 has more than enough oomph

                      Comment

                      • =98=
                        Member
                        • Oct 2006
                        • 10299

                        #12
                        When you can get a Core 2 Duo and motherboard for £70-£80, i doubt it.

                        Comment

                        Working...