8800 Gts 512

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • snakeGS

    #1

    8800 Gts 512

    so the 8800 GTS 512 is better then the GTX / Ultra i just got mine and i love it but i just wanted to make sure i made the right choice because i cant upgrade anymore until late next year
  • Sniper1432
    Member
    • Jun 2006
    • 4616

    #2
    Originally posted by snakeGS View Post
    so the 8800 GTS 512 is better then the GTX / Ultra i just got mine and i love it but i just wanted to make sure i made the right choice because i cant upgrade anymore until late next year
    the 8800 GTS is not better than the ultra/GTX.

    Comment

    • snakeGS

      #3
      lots of people saying the GTS 512mb G92 is better then the gtx i just wanted to make sure i heard right

      Comment

      • CaptainKirk

        #4
        It's better for the money, but the GTX/Ultra still outperforms.

        Comment

        • snakeGS

          #5
          if i would have known that i would have gotten it instead everyone i asked told me to get the GTS lol

          Comment

          • Sniper1432
            Member
            • Jun 2006
            • 4616

            #6
            Originally posted by snakeGS View Post
            if i would have known that i would have gotten it instead everyone i asked told me to get the GTS lol
            Don't get me wrong, the 8800 GTS is still a kickarse card, it plays everything I throw at it maxed. I have the 320mb version and it's still powerful

            Comment

            • snakeGS

              #7
              well see now i could kick myself because a friend is selling his EVGA 8800 SC for 350 hmmm could a return be around the corner lol:nod:

              Comment

              • looqas

                #8
                8800GTS and GTX pretty much go side by side upto 1600x1200, but after that GTX will win because of the higher bandwith. The GTS manages to compensate this, and even win some tests, because it's much higher clocked. Plus GTS has better headroom for clocking due to 65nm line width processing technology.

                You made a good choice anyway. In most cases you won't see any difference unless you are playing at very high resolutions.

                Comment

                • peeth
                  Member
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 319

                  #9
                  ^exactly what he said, its equal and possibly better at lower resolutions but the GTX still wins at higher resolutions.

                  Comment

                  • Eagle101

                    #10
                    i have a 26"inch LCD HD ready tv and am getting a GTX pretty soon what is the highest res i can run on? (sry for asking a ? that is not in my thread in other wrds sry for thread jacking)

                    Comment

                    • samchoc
                      Member
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 66

                      #11
                      I have an XFX 8800GTS 512mb ADE and this card is better than the GTX
                      in DX9 and only as a few fps less in DX10... i bought it for 348.00 at directcanada.com and the GTX is still over 500$ whats the point of buying a GTX anymore? within 4 months i went through a BFG 8800GTS 320mb OC2, EVGA 8800GTS 640mb, XFX 8800GT 512mb ADE and XFX 8800GTS 512mb ADE

                      My friend bought a BFG 8800GTX 768mb OC2 last summer and dont get me wrong but his card still kick it but my card is sooooo close to him that he wants to sell his and get the GTS...

                      If you want a new card get the GT or GTS 512mb otherwise wait for the 9000
                      series in february...

                      Thanks
                      Sam

                      Comment

                      • snakeGS

                        #12
                        For eagle probably whatever your monitor maxes out at, i know that the GTX can max out at 2550 i believe thats what it is with a 30 inch so whatever your monitor can handle that card will produce it. But see im running a Samsung 24 inch so a GTX wouldnt really do me much good would it? so the GTS was a good choice?

                        Comment

                        • looqas

                          #13
                          Originally posted by samchoc View Post
                          I have an XFX 8800GTS 512mb ADE and this card is better than the GTX
                          in DX9 and only as a few fps less in DX10... i bought it for 348.00 at directcanada.com and the GTX is still over 500$ whats the point of buying a GTX anymore? within 4 months i went through a BFG 8800GTS 320mb OC2, EVGA 8800GTS 640mb, XFX 8800GT 512mb ADE and XFX 8800GTS 512mb ADE

                          My friend bought a BFG 8800GTX 768mb OC2 last summer and dont get me wrong but his card still kick it but my card is sooooo close to him that he wants to sell his and get the GTS...

                          If you want a new card get the GT or GTS 512mb otherwise wait for the 9000
                          series in february...

                          Thanks
                          Sam
                          It's not better. Just superior bang for buck. It scarcely makes sense NOW to buy GTX, because first: GTS comes so very close, second: Even if you game at bigger resolutions, the 9xxx series is on it's way and you are guaranteed to have better value for your money when they come out. Prolly the flagship 9xxx will cost the same as the GTX does now but you have a faster product for the same price. So it's wise to hold on and suffer 1-2 months and see what happens. You'll always have time to get the 8800GTX if the 9xxx flagship is a total failure.

                          Comment

                          Working...