Hi All

[buteonidae]

Just saying ello..................


:hi:

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Re: Hi All

I would imagine your sig will be removed soon... Not really a good way to make a first impression on the staff....

But none the less welcome.

[buteonidae]

Re: Hi All

Well there is a note with it, if they have a problem they can always PM me and I will sort it out. I've seen others with similar sign images, I'll keep it till any issues arise.

[John Edmo]

Re: Hi All

Good luck.

[buteonidae]

Re: Hi All

You know, if you can keep your avatra, then I can keep my sign image.

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Re: Hi All

You don't think there is a diffrence between the two?

[buteonidae]

Re: Hi All

Well, both have something sexual. Mine has a females bottom, his has a bit of females breast visible, it's all the same. It's not like either of them are naked. Both images suggest sexual idea behind them. I say if one can't have a females bottom (with underwear on) then no one should be allowed to have ANY images of any sexual nature at all, that includs his avatra.

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Re: Hi All

Well, both have something sexual. Mine has a females bottom, his has a bit of females breast visible, it's all the same. It's not like either of them are naked. Both images suggest sexual idea behind them. I say if one can't have a females bottom (with underwear on) then no one should be allowed to have ANY images of any sexual nature at all, that includs his avatra.

That's odd logic... But whatever...

[buteonidae]

Re: Hi All

Feel free to express your views then.

I find your logic to be odd.

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Re: Hi All

I just don't see how you think showing a tiny bit 'o clevage is the same as a full on ass shot. On yours another CM lower and we'll all the the 'ol brown eye.

[buteonidae]

Re: Hi All

It's all the same. Both images are sexual.

My image is just a bit bigger, if it was a smaller size image would you think differently? All it's showing is just a females bottom, half it it - WITH underwear on.

On yours another CM lower and we'll all the the 'ol brown eye.

Don't quiet understand what you mean there.

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Re: Hi All

It's all the same. Both images are sexual.

My image is just a bit bigger, if it was a smaller size image would you think differently? All it's showing is just a females bottom, half it it - WITH underwear on.




Don't quiet understand what you mean there.

Yes both images are sexual, but to a diffrent extent. I mean a chick blowing a horse is sexual as well, but as we all know would be wildly inapproiate for these forums.

Props to you for conducting a rational conversation about diffrences of opinion. Don't find that much anymore,


One Centimeter lower and we'd see her actual ass hole.

[buteonidae]

Re: Hi All

Yes both images are sexual, but to a diffrent extent. I mean a chick blowing a horse is sexual as well, but as we all know would be wildly inapproiate for these forums.

Props to you for conducting a rational conversation about diffrences of opinion. Don't find that much anymore,


One Centimeter lower and we'd see her actual ass hole.

:laugh: I'd say about 2cm or 3. Move that shirt on his avatra 1cm aside, you could see her nipple. But you can't - it's only an image.

A chick blowing a hores - now, that's just weird. Unless if you mean a female hores? - I'd still find it odd... (amusing,... but odd) :laugh: just jocking.

Anywyas, I'll keep my lovely sign untill I get told to otherwise by one of the mods/admins, even then, I'll argue my case because there are a few images of sexual nature in other peoples signs (females in bikinis etc) :thumbsup:

[lil_jimmy_norton]

Re: Hi All

So where's the sig now?

[Talus]

Re: Hi All

Sig has been changed without a fuss, thank you.

Welcome to the forums! :hi: