I tried out saga, its not bad, just very confussing. Its like, they start you off with some tutorial quests and what not, but it doesnt explain a whole much
I'd recommend empire: total war or company of heroes. I haven't messed with E:TOW online though, but I know they're planning on implementing a multiplayer campaign mod sometimes. COH is fun online or off. A
As for the other recommendations, World in Conflict was dead last I tried playing online, same with Age of Empires 2 (although you can still on occasion find a game on gamespy. Both of those games are great though.
Battle for Middle Earth had a pretty decent size multiplayer scene last I checked, but I never really cared for it. And yes, it does have a turn based campaign to it, think its called battle for the ring...at least the second one does, the one everyone still plays.
Dawn of War takes alot of micromanagement, specifically you have to do alot of clicking to respawn in units while they're in battle. Its a good game but it takes a certain type of gamer.
There's an MMORTS that's been out for a couple of years called Saga. Its free, and is a pretty good little game. There's alot they could do to improve it but well I don't know, its worth a look.
Empire sounds like the "newest" one. On these lists. Everyone has mentioned everything that I was going to post. Other than the C&C stuff, is there anything newer?
Crunch
Leave a comment:
Guest replied
Re: Favorite RTS?
Total Annihilation was probably the best RTS I have played, but that was years ago, essentially supreme commander is the successor to it. Company of heroes is very good at a micro/strat balance.
Leave a comment:
Guest replied
Re: Favorite RTS?
Dude best thing to get atm imho is Company of heroes Anthology if it is fairly priced.
...What have i started? lmao, i own WC3, and Starcraft and AoE2. im looking for some new age stuff, i mean yea they were amazing but ive played them alot and then switched to FPS's and mmorpgs...
And yes, actually, i love the LOTR's series. So i might have to try it out.
Leave a comment: