BF2 or 2142? that is the question....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • where's my chili

    #61
    Re: BF2 or 2142? that is the question....

    imo bf 2142 has potential. if u took the interestng aspects of the game such as active camo, walkers, TITANS (i dont care WHO you are those things are awsome) and merged it with the proven gameplay of bf2 then it could work out.


    that is provided dice doesnt get codeing happy and screw things over......

    Comment

    • Chris_Redfield
      Member
      • Oct 2006
      • 5986

      #62
      Re: BF2 or 2142? that is the question....

      Originally posted by Wasp
      Calling ppl idiots.. Now that's a way to not get your point across.. /moving on
      Not my fault if you felt like you were the one I pointed out. I didnt point my finger at anyone. But I guess if you feel like a duck, look like a duck and sound like a duck, you are a duck.

      Comment

      • eddyeddyd

        #63
        Re: BF2 or 2142? that is the question....

        Originally posted by 7man
        BF2 is better although I have not played 2142 BF2 is way better since from what I have heard is that BF2142 is a bit glitchy
        most game are when they come out...lets hope that when 2142's trun for patch 1.3 rolls around...it wont be sooo HORRIBLE

        Originally posted by Chris_Redfield
        Not my fault if you felt like you were the one I pointed out. I didnt point my finger at anyone. But I guess if you feel like a duck, look like a duck and sound like a duck, you are a duck.
        l-o-l and Z

        Originally posted by where's my chili

        that is provided dice doesnt get codeing happy and screw things over......

        1.3...

        that was like the bf2 gamers holocaust who know how many peope abandoned bf2 cas they thought it was their computer, i thought it was mine, i had bout the game during 1.3 dark reign

        Anyway back on topic, i heard that 2142 was bad and i saw a sniping video where one of the ehadshots didnt kill(some bug itll be patched soon)
        but im going to try it for myself ill probably like both equally the same way i like vannilla and prm

        Comment

        • TotalBF2er

          #64
          Re: BF2 or 2142? that is the question....

          Originally posted by eddyeddyd
          most game are when they come out...\
          Unless it's a game put out by Valve.

          Originally posted by Wasp
          I just laugh when I read about ppl bying a new game and spending like one hour with it before they stop playing.. Like BF2 wasn't a big change from BF1942 and often a very frustrating one at first. I remember how hard it was to actually hit something in BF2 the first times I played it and how many shots it took..
          That is not the case. Besides, if they only played an hour of 2142 before getting disgusted, yet played the BF2 demo 'Gulf Of Oman' for hours and had hella fun, there is something to that...

          Originally posted by Fakesound
          BF2.. 2142 is cartoony

          Bias over younger generations perhaps, rather they have different opinions over fun gameplay, decent graphics and cool looking big toys in 2142.
          Oh I definitely agree with your statement. Younger generations are more into deathmatch, are not loyal to their clans, have less teamwork ethic, less sportsmanship, and less respect for their competitive foes. Graphics > Gameplay is their opinion, and every weapon has to look like a Pokemon weapon. They want to be able to headshot someone without learning how to use a weapon. They search for exploits in a game instead, and use them. They want to play the game according to their own rules and screw everyone else.

          Disclaimer to above statement: This is pointed at North American players. Not all younger players are like this, and IME European and Australian players do not fit this mold.(best games are late night, since the other side of the world starts playing)

          Comment

          Working...