Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Here's a spelling mistake. In the 'Recoil while Zoommed' category, zoomed is spelled with only one m (you have two m's).
1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Collapse
X
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Hey this is great, my only suggestions are making the drop-down list appear in the order you select the class in-game or in alphabetical order (in addition to fixing the zoomming typo)
Very nice work... it's a useful tool for me. I now know that the SCAR-H is very, very similar to the AK-101 and now I won't feel jipped playing as the MEC against the SEALs, lol...
This next suggestion may or may not be a lot of work, but some of these guns aren't that identifiable to the user by name - "Type 88" or anyone that just plays video games for fun and knows next to nothing about gun names may become confused staring at a bunch of letters and numbers. While I'm not one of those people I think that having a picture of the guns might be kind of nice out to the left - the first gun you chose at the top, the second one right below it. Or just put the name of the gun on the picture! :)Leave a comment:
-
Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
If you wwant, I could give some handful tips on CSS, I run two websites which rely quite much on CSS, therfor I'm quite experienced. PM me if you want.Originally posted by HarmorThere isn't any style sheet at the moment. Everything is inline atm. You got any suggestions? I'm a programmer, not an artist.
<--- A guy who would just as well have a Bean Bag for a furniture in his Living Room instead of a couch.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Hehe i saw it. n1ce job!Originally posted by HarmorUpdated the style sheet to make it look like BF2.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Done. Thanks for the input.Originally posted by jdrouYou might want to change "minimum deviation" to "base deviation" for clarity. DICE calls the value "minDev" but it actually functions as the base for further modifications, not the minimum. Similarly, you might want to use "base damage" instead of "damage" since the actual damage varies depending on the target type.
"Sub deviation added per shot" should probably be something like "per-shot deviation reduction per second". (Analogous to the way the cool-down value relates to the heat-added value.)
"Deviation while . . ." should all be "Deviation modifier while . . .".Leave a comment:
-
Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Probably to note that the M95 is different from all other handheld bullet weapons in that it does not have damage reduced by body armor.Originally posted by Doggie52Yeah, harmor, gj! But I was wondering what the little * over the M95 damage means? Headshot?
Because all the automatic weapons do have RoF 600 or 900 in the game except the PKM (and the Jackhammer).Originally posted by Sir. SuperTyphoonHow come all the weapons though either have a rate of fire of 600 or 900 (except for the pkm with 450)???
You might want to change "minimum deviation" to "base deviation" for clarity. DICE calls the value "minDev" but it actually functions as the base for further modifications, not the minimum. Similarly, you might want to use "base damage" instead of "damage" since the actual damage varies depending on the target type.
"Sub deviation added per shot" should probably be something like "per-shot deviation reduction per second". (Analogous to the way the cool-down value relates to the heat-added value.)
"Deviation while . . ." should all be "Deviation modifier while . . .".Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Updated the style sheet to make it look like BF2.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Very nice tool, thanks for putting that together. Being able to do side-to-side comparisons, it made it clear to me that the G36E likely the best gun in the game. Now I know why everyone is a medic
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Wow that's awesome!
How come all the weapons though either have a rate of fire of 600 or 900 (except for the pkm with 450)???
And also, i suggest you change the "This wouldn't had been possible without it" at the top of the page to "This wouldn't have been possible without it."Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Wow! I'm impressed. This tool is absolutely usefull
Keeewwl!!
thx harmorLeave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
nice, very nice
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Many thanks Harmor :)Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Yeah, its a bug...I'm looking at it right now.Originally posted by LanserschrekAnyone else getting no results as soon as you enter the 'L85A1' in either drop down box?
Fixed...seems I had the "L85A1" labeled "L86A1" in my chart.Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
Anyone else getting no results as soon as you enter the 'L85A1' in either drop down box?Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedRe: 1.30 Weapon Compare Webpage
very nice. Great job.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: