Define the word relative next please. Come on man, you're splitting hairs for the sake of the argument. You know what a "Fair Fight" is. You know it's not spawning to die the second you spawn. You know it's not a fair fight when the tank or APC kills you 10 times before you can kill it with the AT. You must know it's not fair to take advantage of a situation for the gratification of only yourself when the cost is ruining the whole experience for the rest of us. Or perhaps you don't get it, in which case you truly are ignorant and thereby excused from any meaningful debate. If this is the case, just tell me and I will stop taunting you with reason and logic.Originally Posted by Cornbread Mafia
You’re only showing your own ignorance at this point by trying to argue and define what is and is not fair.
We all accept that this is a game. We all accept that in this game, the point is to use team based play to achieve goals. The goal is to win and the objective is to cap, hold and defend flags. Hence the whole debate over non-team based play.
When your actions in the game ruin the experience for someone else who paid the same money that you did because you cannot win by using tactics that are commonly accepted as "fair", then you are the smacktard. It does not take a genius to figure this out. If your only defense for something it to say that since it's possible it must be ok to do it, then please go jump off a very high cliff. Jumping off a cliff to your death is possible, so it must be ok right?
Give me a break. Corn and Mother should be on the 4th grade debate team arguing over the environmental effects of finger-paint.